🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart atomic talks with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated only diplomacy worked, and disclosed new appeals had originated from mediators to resume negotiations with the Trump administration. He said Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Course

Araghchi is navigating a complex course since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out more powerful militarily and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president declaring the locations had been eliminated. Subsequently, European countries employed their privilege to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was decided an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the deal to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Status

Iranian officials said the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the offer could be resurrected in certain ways if talks reopen.

The American leader recently claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but privately Iranian officials say they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his speech to the forum, designed to depict the US as a dominant force that misuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the clash could not be ended by military means. He said the attacks began with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an absolute demand for a truce.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were carried out with total Washington understanding and collaboration, making trust hard to restore.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Resolution

Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly sought to impose their will during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be active and remains the final answer to settle conflicts, but its standards, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and respect, they will get a answer in the identical language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of restoration and recovery, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have come to know our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He stated: "We managed to survive this war. Our nuclear technology, which they intended to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be restored; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but did not succeed to break. The citizens of Tehran have developed more powerful, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the leadership and the state in the aftermath of this attack."