🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.