🔗 Share this article

Via an unsigned order, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to employ a redrawn congressional district plan that is projected to include up to five new conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three decision, released on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to overturn a district court's block that had rejected the boundaries in November.

Justices' Explanation

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and disturbing the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the order stated in explaining its ruling.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had probably sorted voters according to their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it passed the boundaries. It had ordered the state to use the maps drawn after the most recent national count for the next year's election.

Sharp Opposition

In a forcefully written objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's ruling. She contended that it undermined the work of the district court, pointing out that its opinion was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a dissent joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted political tilt, will control next year's elections. And it ensures that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be grouped in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a infraction of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The ruling occurs during a countrywide battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican majority. Typically, redistricting takes place after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a series of events among other states.

Republicans in including North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that are estimated to yield a number of additional conservative seats. The opposition, in response, have countered with revised boundaries in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas AG welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that guarantees representation supportive of Republicans. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

On the other hand, Democratic representatives criticized the decision. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the chair of a major party campaign committee.

A leading House figure argued the court had another time damaged its credibility by upholding a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he concluded.